top of page

I conduct research in two areas. In the first, I propose and test developmental theories of rapid, intuitive moral judgments and decision making. Toward this end, I am focused on novel assessment creation and the use of advanced statistical methods (factor analysis, structural equation modeling, etc.) to study latent psychological constructs. Much of this work is focused on the development and use of text-based instruments to test nuanced theories for neuro- and psycholinguistic processing—primarily related to time courses of categorization and stereotype activation and their influence on moral judgments.

 

In my other line of research, I search for relationships between latent psychological factors and learning and behavioral outcomes. My recent studies in this area have included looking at the effects of gender stereotypes and political identity on moral intuition development in early adolescents and the ways that morality framing in various cultural contexts influences science education outcomes and beliefs about science.

 

I currently have two large research projects underway. The first is continued data collection using an instrument I have validated to assess early adolescents’ moral intuitions (The Character Foundations Survey). Currently, more than 3,000 middle and high school students from predominantly conservative counties in rural America have taken this survey. The goal is to expand data collection to various social and cultural demographics in the US and abroad with the purpose of testing theoretical hypotheses about the relationship between adolescent moral development and political identity/ideology formation. The second is a series of studies to test specific neurolinguistic hypotheses of gender stereotypes and their ability to influence rapid, intuitive moral judgments when assessed using text-based stimuli.

Character Foundations Survey

Brandon Bretl, Principal Investigator

KU IRB: STUDY00142366

The Character Foundations Survey (CFS) is an instrument for studying how moral intuitions (feelings about right and wrong) are influenced by various factors like age, sex, gender identity, political ideology, religion, education, and other socio-cultural, epistemological, and demographic factors. 

 

Students rate a series of conventional and moral violations on degree of wrongness and outcomes are analyzed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Covariances between factors and factor means are compared to look for unique developmental patterns. 

The CFS is based on a synthesis of moral foundations theory and social domain theory. Through this synthesis, adolescent moral development can be seen as the result of a gene-culture coevolutionary process, and more rigorous predictions about adolescent moral development can be made.

To date, more than 3,000 middle and high school students from more than 11 different schools in Kansas have taken the CFS. 

school-ed-image.jpg
Slide1.png
4-schools-cfs.png

Assessing Effects of Variable Presentations of Gender Information in Text-based Moral Intuition Assessments. 

Brandon Bretl, Principal Investigator

Preliminary analysis shows significant effects of the order in which gender information is presented in text-based moral violation vignettes. These effects are consistent with literature on the time courses of text-based priming effects and stereotype activation. See my paper in The Journal of Psychology at https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2020.1832034

 

This paradigm offers many opportunities to assess theories of cognitive processes during moral intuition deployment and the influence of stereotype activation in moral judgments. 

university-of-wisconsin-eau-claire-vecto
Screen Shot 2020-12-10 at 12.51.57 PM.pn
bottom of page